Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Free Systemic Psychotherapy's avatar

Thank you for sharing such a raw and powerful expression. Your words carry deep emotional and moral weight, and they come from a place of profound conviction. They reflect the anguish of witnessing enormous suffering in Gaza, and the frustration at what feels like global inaction or complicity. These are not light matters—and they deserve serious reflection, not defensiveness or deflection.

As a Jew, I want to speak to you not in opposition, but in deep conversation—because these moments ask us not only for clarity but for compassion. And compassion must stretch in more than one direction.

I carry the grief too. I grieve for the families in Gaza. I grieve for the destruction. But I also carry a different kind of weight: the burden of being Jewish in a time when once again, Jewish identity is equated with the worst imaginable crimes. I carry the echoes of history—the blood libels, the propaganda posters, the accusations that Jews, by nature or faith, are responsible for harm, manipulation, control. Today, those old tropes are dressed in new language: ethnic cleansing, apartheid, genocide. And while there must always be room to critique Israeli policy—harshly and truthfully—the collapsing of Israel into a singular evil often leaves no space for Jewish fear, Jewish complexity, or Jewish trauma.

You speak of genocide. That word should never be used lightly. It invokes the darkest acts humanity can commit. But many, including international legal scholars, argue that the situation in Gaza, however horrific, does not meet the legal standard of genocide—which requires a clear intent to destroy a people as such. The Israeli government says its target is Hamas, an armed group that launched an attack on October 7 that left 1,200 people dead, hundreds raped, burned, kidnapped. The war that followed has been brutal. Many of us wish it had not happened. Many of us believe the current government is corrupt and destructive. But believing it is genocide—that Israel is trying to exterminate the Palestinian people—requires ignoring a mountain of counter-evidence: the warnings to civilians, the attempts (however flawed) to allow aid in, the internal dissent within Israel itself, and the many Jews who oppose the war and defend Israel’s right to exist.

You reject the idea of a Jewish ethnoreligious state. I understand why. It feels exclusionary, unjust. But I ask you to consider this: Israel was born not only from the ashes of the Holocaust, but also from the flames of expulsion, humiliation, and violence faced by Jews across the Middle East and North Africa. Over 850,000 Jews were driven out of Arab and Muslim lands in the 20th century—many with nothing but the clothes they wore. Today, roughly 70% of Jews in Israel descend from these communities. They cannot “go back.” There is no return. Their synagogues were torched, their cemeteries destroyed, their histories erased. For them, and for us all, Israel is not a colonial project—it is home. It is refuge.

And that refuge must be defended—not out of blind nationalism, but because there is no other. It is the only Jewish-majority country in the world. And while the world tells us that Israel is a failed state of oppression, the truth on the ground tells a more complex story. Within Israel’s borders, Arab Muslims, Christians, Druze, and even ancient groups like the Samaritans not only live—they grow. Their populations increase steadily, their children attend universities, serve in Knesset, become doctors, lawyers, artists. In fact, the Christian population in Israel is the only one in the region that is growing. In neighboring countries—Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Lebanon—minorities are vanishing under persecution or war. Where are the mass protests for them?

So while we must always interrogate Israel’s actions and policies, let’s also remember: Israel is not the worst of the Middle East—it is, in many ways, the exception. And rather than burying our heads in guilt that is not ours to carry, we can feel something else—a complicated but earned pride. Pride that in a region where minorities are hunted, we have built a country, flawed but resilient, where minorities grow. Pride that we have welcomed waves of refugees, from Ethiopia to Russia to Iraq to Yemen, and made a fractured people into a society. And pride that we still argue, still protest, still demand more from ourselves—that is not apartheid, that is democracy in anguish.

You call Zionism colonialism. But Jews did not come to Palestine as colonists of empire. They came as refugees, as dreamers, as survivors. Many bought land legally. Many lived alongside Arabs in peace. And yes, there was displacement and war—wars fought in 1948, 1967, and again and again—wars in which Jewish survival was not guaranteed. That doesn't erase Palestinian suffering. It doesn’t justify injustice. But it complicates the story—and to call all Jews in Israel colonists, conquerors, or foreign invaders is to erase the deep historical and spiritual connection Jews have had to that land for thousands of years.

And finally, you reject divine right. I do too, in many ways. I don’t believe land belongs to anyone because God said so. But I also know that for many people—Muslims, Christians, Jews—faith isn’t just a private belief. It’s a part of their history, identity, and longing. And for Jews, the idea of returning to Zion wasn’t a slogan. It was a 2,000-year prayer.

None of this is to deny the suffering in Gaza. It is horrifying. It should shake us. It should demand response, and restraint, and accountability. But I ask—gently—that in your moral outrage, you don’t lose sight of the complexity, the trauma, the context. And that when the world chants in accusation, you leave some space for Jewish pain too.

Because we all want a future without war, without displacement, without walls. But we won’t get there if we deny each other’s stories.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts